ABSTRACT
Introduction: People affected by diabetes are at higher risk for complications from certain vaccine-preventable diseases. Suboptimal vaccination coverages are reported in this population sub-group. The purpose of this study is to estimate the proportion of diabetic patients who express hesitation to the COVID-19 vaccine worldwide.Methods: Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis and systematic review, selected from scientific articles available in the MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus databases from 2020 to 2022. The following terms were used for the search strategy: (adherence OR hesitancy OR compliance OR attitude) AND (covid* OR SARS*) AND (vaccin* OR immun*) AND (diabet*).Results: The vaccine hesitation rate among persons with diabetes was 27.8 % (95 %CI = 15.6-41.9 %). In the comparison of vaccine hesitancy between sexes and educational status, the RRs were 0.90 (95 %CI = 0.71-1.15) and 0.88 (95 %CI = 0.76-1.02), respectively. The main reasons of unwillingness were lack of information, opinion that the vaccine was unsafe or not efficient, and fear of adverse events.Conclusions: In order to achieve a high vaccination coverage, multifactorial approach is needed, which requires major social, scientific and health efforts. The success of the vaccination campaign in this population depends on the capillarity and consistency of the interventions implemented.
ABSTRACT
Background. As other indoor sports facilities, swimming pools were closed in Italy from March to May 2020 and from October 2020 to July 2021 due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic;access to these facilities was restricted to athletes of national relevance. This decision was based on "precautionary principles” and without evidence of a high risk of SARS-COV-2 circulation among swimming pools' attendants. The aim of this paper is to describe the pattern of SARS-COV-2 circulation among swimming athletes in Apulia (Southern Italy). Study design. The study aims to investigate the hypothesis that attending a pool increases the risk of SARSCOV-2 infection. The outcome measure is the incidence of SARS-COV-2 infection among swimming athletes compared with the general population. Methods. This is a retrospective cross-sectional study carried out in Apulia, Southern Italy. The study was performed through the analysis of both the database of the Italian Swimming Federation and the SARS-COV-2 infections in Apulia Region, from July 2020 to August 2021. Results. Among 2,939 federally licensed athletes, 221 had an history of SARS-COV-2 infection from July 2020 to August 2021, with an incidence of 75.2 /1,000. In the general Apulian population, during the same time span, the incidence of SARS-COV-2 infection was 67.3/1,000 and - considering the incidence rate ratio - there is no difference between the two populations (IRR=1.1;95% CI=0.9-1.3;p>0.05). Conclusions. The incidence of SARS-COV-2 infection in Apulian swimmers showed no significant differences with the general population. © Società Editrice Universo (SEU), Roma, Italy
ABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 emergency has highlighted the importance of prevention systems and environ-mental microbiological monitoring as fundamental elements in the response to epidemics and other such threats to individual and collective health. The use of automated "No-touch" room disinfection systems eliminates or reduces the dependence on operators, thus allowing an improvement in the effectiveness of terminal disinfection. Study design: In the present study, we focused on possible SARS-CoV-2 contamination of surfaces of com-mercial services, and the effectiveness of ozone treatment on the virus. Methods: Analyses were conducted on 4-7 October and 27-30 December 2021 in four supermarkets in an Apulian city;supermarkets A and B were equipped with an ozonisation system, while C and D were without any environmental remediation. Results: SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected by real-time RT-PCR only in December, in 6% of the surfaces tested, and all examined samples were found to be negative after viral culture, since no cytopathic effect was observed. A statistically significant difference emerged from the comparison of October vs. December (p = 0.0289), but no statistically significant difference (p = 0.6777) emerged from the comparison between supermarkets with and without the ozonisation system. Conclusions: Although no important changes were observed by treating the environments with ozonisation systems, further studies are needed to validate the effectiveness of environmental treatments with airborne disinfectants.
ABSTRACT
Introduction. Healthcare workers on duty at the hospital are at high risk of COVID-19 infection. However, despite the introduction of risk-lowering practices in the hospital setting, there have been many cases of SARS-COV-2 infection among Health Care Workers. Fast and efficient contact tracing and Sars-CoV-2 PCR-based testing of the close contacts of Health Care Workers with confirmed infections are essential steps to limit nosocomial outbreaks. Methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted at Bari Policlinico General University-Hospital (Apulia, Italy) and describes the management of a cluster of SARS-COV-2 infections in three Operative Units. The contact tracing activities and the measures implemented to control the outbreak are described. Results. Among the 186 Health Care Workers active in the cluster setting, there were 9 (4.8%) confirmed cases, including the index case. Due to the outbreak, three Operative Units were closed to limit virus circulation. Health Care Workers with confirmed infections tested negative after a mean of 28.0±6.6 days (range: 13–37) and none required hospitalization.Conclusions. Protection of the health of Health Care Workers during the COVID-19 pandemic should be a public health priority. However, despite recent recommendations and the implementation of protective measures, SARS-COV-2 infections of Health Care Workers remain at a high rate, indicative of the continued high risk of cluster onset in the nosocomial setting. © Società Editrice Universo (SEU), Roma, Italy
ABSTRACT
Background Pregnant and breastfeeding women are at an increased risk of severe illness from COVID-19 compared to people who are not pregnant. Therefore, the CDC recommends COVID-19 vaccination for women who are pregnant, breastfeeding, and trying to become pregnant or who may become pregnant in the future. Despite this, low vaccination coverages are reported in this population sub-group. The purpose of this study is to estimate the proportion of pregnant and breastfeeding women expressing hesitation to the COVID-19 vaccine worldwide. Determinants of vaccine compliance and options suggestedto address vaccine hesitancy were also analyzed. Methods Forty-six studies were included in the meta-analysis and systematic review, selected from scientific articles available in the MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases between January 1, 2020 and February 6, 2022. The following terms were used for the search strategy: (adherence OR hesitancy OR compliance OR attitude) AND (covid* OR SARS*) AND (vaccin* OR immun*) AND (pregnan* OR post-partum OR breastfeeding OR lactating). Results The vaccine hesitation rate was 48.4% (95%CI=43.4-53.4%). In a sub analysis by study period, the pooled prevalence of vaccine hesitation was 40.0% (95%CI=31.6-46.6%) considering surveys administered in 2020, 58.0% (95%CI=48.9-66.9%) considering surveys administered in the first semester of 2021, and 38.1% (95%CI=25.9-51.2%) considering surveys administered in the second semester of 2021. The main reasons for vaccine hesitation were lack of information about vaccination, opinion that the vaccine is unsafe, and fear of adverse events for both mother and fetus/child. Conclusions In order to achieve high vaccination coverage, a multifactorial approach is needed, requiring major social, scientific, and health efforts. The success of the vaccination campaign in this population depends on the capillarity and consistency of the interventions implemented. Key messages • Vaccine hesitancy can be a determining factor in the success (or otherwise) of the anti-COVID-19 immunization campaign. • Vaccine hesitancy in pregnant and breastfeeding women is a genuine public health concern worldwide.
ABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 emergency has highlighted the importance of prevention systems and environmental microbiological monitoring as fundamental elements in the response to epidemics and other such threats to individual and collective health. The use of automated "No-touch" room disinfection systems eliminates or reduces the dependence on operators, thus allowing an improvement in the effectiveness of terminal disinfection. Study design: In the present study, we focused on possible SARS-CoV-2 contamination of surfaces of commercial services, and the effectiveness of ozone treatment on the virus. Methods: Analyses were conducted on 4-7 October and 27-30 December 2021 in four supermarkets in an Apulian city;supermarkets A and B were equipped with an ozonisation system, while C and D were without any environmental remediation. Results: SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected by real-time RT-PCR only in December, in 6% of the surfaces tested, and all examined samples were found to be negative after viral culture, since no cytopathic effect was observed. A statistically significant difference emerged from the comparison of October vs. December (p = 0.0289), but no statistically significant difference (p = 0.6777) emerged from the comparison between supermarkets with and without the ozonisation system. Conclusions: Although no important changes were observed by treating the environments with ozonisation systems, further studies are needed to validate the effectiveness of environmental treatments with airborne disinfectants.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The Istituto Superiore di Sanita and the Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco coordinate the project TheShinISS-Vax, Flu, a post-marketing "active" surveillance of influenza vaccines. We report the results of the investigation using the Self- Controlled Case Series (SCCS) design on influenza vaccine and Guillain-Barre syndrome in vaccinated population aged over than 6 months, during the influenza vaccine campaign 2020-2021 in Italy. Materials and methods: A SCCS multi-regional study was carried out using linked data from Regional Health Care Registries of Valle d'Aosta, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Emilia-Romagna, Toscana, Lazio, Campania, and Puglia. Relative incidence of Guillain-Barre syndrome was estimated, comparing the exposure risk periods (0-41 days from the vaccination day, subdivided in six intervals) with the unexposed period.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: As other indoor sports facilities, swimming pools were closed in Italy from March to May 2020 and from October 2020 to July 2021 due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic;access to these facilities was restricted to athletes of national relevance. This decision was based on "precautionary principles" and without evidence of a high risk of SARS-COV-2 circulation among swimming pools' attendants. The aim of this paper is to describe the pattern of SARS-COV-2 circulation among swimming athletes in Apulia (Southern Italy). STUDY DESIGN: The study aims to investigate the hypothesis that attending a pool increases the risk of SARSCOV- 2 infection. The outcome measure is the incidence of SARS-COV-2 infection among swimming athletes compared with the general population. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study carried out in Apulia, Southern Italy. The study was performed through the analysis of both the database of the Italian Swimming Federation and the SARS-COV-2 infections in Apulia Region, from July 2020 to August 2021. RESULTS: Among 2,939 federally licensed athletes, 221 had an history of SARS-COV-2 infection from July 2020 to August 2021, with an incidence of 75.2 /1,000. In the general Apulian population, during the same time span, the incidence of SARS-COV-2 infection was 67.3/1,000 and - considering the incidence rate ratio - there is no difference between the two populations (IRR=1.1;95% CI=0.9-1.3;p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of SARS-COV-2 infection in Apulian swimmers showed no significant differences with the general population.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Healthcare workers on duty at the hospital are at high risk of COVID-19 infection. However, despite the introduction of risk-lowering practices in the hospital setting, there have been many cases of SARS-COV-2 infection among Health Care Workers. Fast and efficient contact tracing and Sars-CoV-2 PCR-based testing of the close contacts of Health Care Workers with confirmed infections are essential steps to limit nosocomial outbreaks. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Bari Policlinico General University-Hospital (Apulia, Italy) and describes the management of a cluster of SARS-COV-2 infections in three Operative Units. The contact tracing activities and the measures implemented to control the outbreak are described. RESULTS: Among the 186 Health Care Workers active in the cluster setting, there were 9 (4.8%) confirmed cases, including the index case. Due to the outbreak, three Operative Units were closed to limit virus circulation. Health Care Workers with confirmed infections tested negative after a mean of 28.0±6.6 days (range: 13-37) and none required hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Protection of the health of Health Care Workers during the COVID-19 pandemic should be a public health priority. However, despite recent recommendations and the implementation of protective measures, SARS-COV-2 infections of Health Care Workers remain at a high rate, indicative of the continued high risk of cluster onset in the nosocomial setting.
ABSTRACT
Foreward: Nurses' attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination is a relevant issue, for the protection of the vulnerable people they care for, and the key role they play in promoting health behaviors that encourage trust and adherence to vaccination among population. This study aimed to validate the Italian version of the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) scale and to describe nurses' attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination. Design: A cross-sectional study was carried out from May to June 2021. Descriptive statistics, Explorative and Confirmatory Factor Analyses have been performed. Methods: An online survey was carried out in Italy. The VAX scale referring to the COVID-19 vaccine was used. Findings: 430 nurses participated in the study, mainly female (73.2%). Mean age was 40.2 years. VAX scale revealed an optimal reliability; Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Analysis supported a 4-factors model. VAX scale mean scores showed low mistrust about vaccine's benefit (2.03±1.07), concerns about commercial profiteering (2.33±1.39) and preference for natural immunity (2.90±1.37). More worries concerning unexpected future effects were found (4.46±1.36). Gender, taking care of a frail person in family, having children or working in a COVID-19 setting are no significantly related to vaccination attitude. Participants from northern Italy expressed greater confidence in vaccine's benefits, the younger had significant lower scores about commercial profiteering. Conclusions: The Italian version of the VAX scale resulted a reliable tool to assess the nurses' attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination. An overall positive nurses' attitude towards the COVID-19 vaccination was highlighted. The concern about unforeseen future effects suggested the need to increase the information on this issue. Clinical relevance: The results provided a valid and reliable tool to measure vaccination attitudes in the Italian context. This study could strengthen the health policies with educational interventions of healthcare workers through specific vaccination pathways. The healthcare professionals' vaccination attitudes play the key role also in promoting vaccination uptake in the population.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Adult , COVID-19/prevention & control , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Italy , Reproducibility of Results , VaccinationABSTRACT
Introduction. Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS) is a pre-malignant plasma cell disorder reported in approximately 3% of individuals aged > 50 years, characterized by a low risk (about 1% per year) of evolution into “overt” myeloma or other lymphoproliferative diseases. It is classified as IgM-MGUS (15%) and non-IgM-MGUS (80-85%). MGUS is usually asymptomatic, but a higher risk of deep venous thrombosis and infection has been reported. In March 2020, “Coronavirus Disease 2019” (COVID-19) outbreak has been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. Regarding outcome of COVID-19 in patients with plasma cell dyscrasia, many papers have been published about multiple myeloma (MM), reporting a higher fatality rate respect to general population, while few data are available about the outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with MGUS. Methods. We collected clinical data on MGUS Apulian patients with SARS- CoV-2 infection, tested by RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal swabs between March 1st, 2020 and April 30st, 2021. Among 1454 MGUS patients followed at our center, 91 were found SARS-CoV-2 positive, enrolled in this observational, retrospective study and compared with 182 age and sex-matched normal controls. Clinical data collected regarded: symptoms, hospitalization, hospitalization in intensive care unit, death. Calculations were carried out using Stata MP17. Results. Mean age of whole group (n. 273) was 65,3+/-13,3 years (range: 29-89), with no statistically-significant differences (p=0,734) observed between MGUS-group (65,6+/-13,3;range: 29-89 years) and controls-group (65,2+/- 13,4;range: 29-89 years). Mean number of comorbidities in the whole group was 1,2+/-1,2 (range: 0-5) and no statistically-significant differences (p=0,844) were found between MGUS-group (1,3+/-1,3;range: 0-5) and control group (1,2+/- 0,9;range: 0-3). About MGUS-subtypes, the most frequent was IgG-kappa (n=36;39,6%), followed by IgG-lambda (n=27;29,7%) and IgM-kappa (n=6;6,6%). Regarding MGUS risk-stratification, application of Mayo Clinic model identified 22 patients (24,2%) with low risk, 22 (24,2%) with low-intermediate risk, and 3 (3,3%) with high-intermediate risk;in 44 patients (48,3%) this data was missing. Immunoparesis was present in 13 cases (14,3%) and absent in 55 (60,4%), missing in 23 (25,3%). No patient developed MM or a lymphoproliferative disease progression during and immediately after COVID-19. Rates of symptoms (59,3% vs 56%), hospitalization (20,9% vs 14,3%), hospitalization in intensive care unit (11% vs 8,8%) and death (8,8% vs 5,5%) were slightly higher in MGUS group than controls (Table 1), but these differences were not statistically significant. A statistically significant association (p<0,05), was observed between higher age and death in both groups. Lastly, incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in MGUS patients (6,2%) was not statistically significant different from that observed in the population of the Puglia region (5,8%) in the same period. Conclusions. To our knowledge, this report is the largest study of patients with MGUS and SARS-CoV-2 infection to date. In our study patients with MGUS did not show an increased incidence of this infection compared to the general population and did not appear to represent a risk factor for poor outcome in COVID-19. [Formula presented] Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Immunization Programs , Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Immunization Programs/statistics & numerical data , Italy , Time FactorsABSTRACT
the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic started in December 2019 and still remains a major global health issue. Every country in the world has adopted drastic measures to contain the virus, although their stringency varies among countries, ranging from increased surveillance and focused interventions to strict lockdown (1). Italy was the second country where the disease had a major impact early in the pandemic, such that a strict nationwide lockdown was declared from March 9 to May 3, 2020. Nonetheless, between January and May 2020, there were 210,000 COVID-19 cases in Italy and 29,000 deaths were recorded (2). Due to the lockdown, universities (and in general all educational services) shifted to online classes, with students attending lessons and taking their exams from home. On-site activities were reduced to those considered indispensable. Research activities also had to be modified, such as by the adoption of a smart-working model (3). Between May and August 2020, the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections in Italy decreased. In response, the lockdown was loosened and some activities were restarted, albeit with specific safety protocols (social distancing, use of masks, temperature checks at the workplace entry, environmental disinfection, mixed models of smart and in-office work). These actions were accompanied by periodic serological and PCR screening tests (4).
Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Universities , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Masks , Physical Distancing , VaccinationABSTRACT
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)-related infection has a major impact on public health, and healthcare workers (HCWs) are exposed to high biological risk. This paper describes the prevention procedures introduced at the University Hospital of Bari, Italy to reduce the risk to HCWs, consisting of enhanced preventive measures and activation of a report system to collect HCWs' contacts. Twenty-three confirmed cases of infection (0.4% of all HCWs) were reported in the 30-day observation period following implementation of the protocol. This shows that correct management of HCWs' contacts is essential to avoid nosocomial clusters.